Aug. 16th, 2006

sdelmonte: (Default)
From the IAU meeting in Prague, it's the new definition of a planet. Which would bestow that status on Pluto still, but also on Charon (formerly Pluto's presumed moon), Ceres and "Xena." Twleve other objects might also be elgible for planet status.

The resolution would also distinguish between "classical planets" such as the original eight known to man and "dwarf planets." And between the classical planets and bodies like Pluto which would be called "plutons."

The new definition of a planet is simple - it's more or less round, and in orbit around the Sun. And it seems arbitrary. I like the idea of separating between objects with more regular orbits and everything else, but the rest strikes me as potentially confusing to the geenral public and not very well thought out. As much as I want to see Pluto stay a planet, maybe it would be better to just call the Big Eight planets rather than engage in a multiplcation of orbiting entities.

Read the article, follow the links to the actual draft resolution, and let me what you think.

Meanwhile, the Red Lectroids from Planet Ten are upset that under the new defintion their stil-undiscovered planet would have to be renamed Planet Thirteen. :)

Profile

sdelmonte: (Default)
Alex W

January 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 14th, 2026 09:11 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios