The Death of a Mediocre President
Jun. 6th, 2004 05:20 amKind of surprised that few have posted about this yet. But I am still a political beast, and one who will spned the next week cringing at the coverage of Reagan's death, so here are some (edited) thoughts I composed for another board...
I do offer sincere condolences to RR's family, who have suffered for many years as they watched a man they care for decline and essentially vanish. I also offer condolences to those who admired the man.
That said, while compared to Dubya RR seems a lot better, I consider him a mediocre (if successful) president who gets credit for keeping most of his promises and for helping to end to Cold War, but who for the most part stood for all the wrong things. He ended the New Deal era of social welfare, increased the deficit greatly, turned his back on the cities, dealt a blow to the labor unions, and paved the way for the excesses of the curent regime. He presided over the sometimes absurd, sometimes dangerous Iran-Contra mess, confused reality with the movies, surrounded himself with increasingly corrupt aides, and left this nation in worse shape than he found it in, though few seemed to notice.
Never mind that I never understood why he was called the Great Communicator. (Give me Bill Clinton's speechifying any day.)
I say all this now simply because it will be whitewsahed away till the funeral. I remember the utter crap we got when Nixon died. It was as if Wategate never happened. Dead celebrities get free rides, even dead disgraced politicians. I do not want to stop the millions who disagree with my assessment of Reagan from mourning him. I just don't want to see the media's iconography.
(Of course, I would bet than when Jimmy Carter passes on, he doesn't get the same Get Out of Jail card, even though I have long admired and respected him far more than any other ex-president.)
Between RR and the almost-sacred tones that the anniversary of D-Day is now receiving, I think I will skip the news today.
I do offer sincere condolences to RR's family, who have suffered for many years as they watched a man they care for decline and essentially vanish. I also offer condolences to those who admired the man.
That said, while compared to Dubya RR seems a lot better, I consider him a mediocre (if successful) president who gets credit for keeping most of his promises and for helping to end to Cold War, but who for the most part stood for all the wrong things. He ended the New Deal era of social welfare, increased the deficit greatly, turned his back on the cities, dealt a blow to the labor unions, and paved the way for the excesses of the curent regime. He presided over the sometimes absurd, sometimes dangerous Iran-Contra mess, confused reality with the movies, surrounded himself with increasingly corrupt aides, and left this nation in worse shape than he found it in, though few seemed to notice.
Never mind that I never understood why he was called the Great Communicator. (Give me Bill Clinton's speechifying any day.)
I say all this now simply because it will be whitewsahed away till the funeral. I remember the utter crap we got when Nixon died. It was as if Wategate never happened. Dead celebrities get free rides, even dead disgraced politicians. I do not want to stop the millions who disagree with my assessment of Reagan from mourning him. I just don't want to see the media's iconography.
(Of course, I would bet than when Jimmy Carter passes on, he doesn't get the same Get Out of Jail card, even though I have long admired and respected him far more than any other ex-president.)
Between RR and the almost-sacred tones that the anniversary of D-Day is now receiving, I think I will skip the news today.
What if...
Date: Jun. 6th, 2004 06:59 am (UTC)Re: What if...
Date: Jun. 6th, 2004 02:20 pm (UTC)As for a President Wayne, he was very polticial, and it's a bit of a wonder that he didn't run for office. He probably would have been very much like Reagan.
(no subject)
Date: Jun. 6th, 2004 07:26 am (UTC)I think he didn't do a terrible job. Maybe it's just in contrast to what we have now. I feel sort of sad because he was such a familiar figure during my younger teen years, and he was a comforting speaker. However, I didn't agree with his policies and you're right, there's going to be whitewashing, and yes, I think Carter won't get the same gentle treatment, which is unfair but that's how things have been lately.
I wonder
Date: Jun. 6th, 2004 12:33 pm (UTC)Re: I wonder
Date: Jun. 6th, 2004 02:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Jun. 6th, 2004 05:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Jun. 12th, 2004 04:22 am (UTC)I really hope they don't start erecting a bunch of monuments and naming places/streets after him!
(By the way, I happened upon your journal randomly, and am very pleased to find one that makes me nod my head and smile instead of grimace!!!)
(no subject)
Date: Jun. 14th, 2004 07:13 am (UTC)