(no subject)

Date: Aug. 21st, 2006 05:01 pm (UTC)
The reason they are trying to resolve this now is because of the discovery of 2003 UB313 last April. It's so similar to Pluto they need to know how to classify it. It's also another in an ever growing list that is remarkably like Pluto.

Please also consider that they are addressing the above mentioned issues.

To the best of my knowledge, the reason they are trying to resolve this now is because of the discovery of 2003 UB313 last April. It's so similar to Pluto they need to know how to classify it. It's also another in an ever growing list that is remarkably like Pluto.

Please also consider that they are addressing the above mentioned issues.
Solar flares

Asteroids hurtiling towards Earth

And well yes some more discussion on the science budget would be nice.

I think that the definition of a planet is just getting so much press and being talked about by everyone because Pluto's status has been debated over for decades and this definition will finally put the issue to rest as much as it ever can be.

Oh and for the record I love the term Pluton, though not for any scientific reason.

And sorry sdelmonte for butting in.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

sdelmonte: (Default)
Alex W

January 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 3rd, 2025 06:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios