sdelmonte: (Default)
[personal profile] sdelmonte
So you probably heard through the geekvine that a judge ruled that the wife and daughter of Superman's co-creator Jerry Siegel are now the owners of half of Superman's copyright (in accordance with a revision to the copyright laws in the late 90s that allows them to file papers to reclaim it under certain circumstances).

Some fans think this is great, a real boost to creators rights. Others think that the Siegels are just being greedy and have no right to anything. While I wholly disagree with the latter and generally agree with the former, I have a minority view: After 70 years, Superman shouldn't belong to anyone. His copyright should have expired by now. Period. Yes, the Siegels are right to want their fair share of the profits that Jerry Siegel was denied by the company that eventually became today's DC. Yes, DC has by and large done a very good job as Superman's stewards. But I am a big believer in the simple idea that copyrights expire.

Superman should be in the public domain. So should Mickey Mouse, and Popeye. So should Batman, after 69 years. But that's not the law of the land anymore, and I doubt it ever will be again. Still, I can dream.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

sdelmonte: (Default)
Alex W

January 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 11th, 2025 11:04 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios