Send in the Clone, For Real?
Dec. 27th, 2002 02:43 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
And then the world, already strange, got stranger...
http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=healthNews&storyID=1967600
(Wherein a religious sect of the "aliens are our gods" variety claims to have produced the first human clone)
I don't know what is more disturbing: that a religious sect - cult is a better word - would be the first to try and create a human clone; or that the scientific world is now forced to deal with the remote possibility that a clone has been created and the greater likelihood that any cloning research, no matter how legitimate, has been tainted forever.
http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=healthNews&storyID=1967600
(Wherein a religious sect of the "aliens are our gods" variety claims to have produced the first human clone)
I don't know what is more disturbing: that a religious sect - cult is a better word - would be the first to try and create a human clone; or that the scientific world is now forced to deal with the remote possibility that a clone has been created and the greater likelihood that any cloning research, no matter how legitimate, has been tainted forever.
(no subject)
Date: Dec. 28th, 2002 04:17 am (UTC)On the other hand, now the debate is really open, rather than just theoretical reactionism. We can't just say "Cloning is wrong, period." Now there's a child who wouldn't have been born without it