It could have been done a lot better. I'm not saying it was rancid. It's just that King's forte is prose, and considering the odd literary traditions from which DT derives, I'd really rather not run the risk of the comics taking on the same qualities -- and considering the time period in canon that they're going to cover, that chance is so there. I like old-school chivalric narratives (so long as they're not in Middle English), and I like Owen Wister-style Westerns (even if the ideology is problematic), but neither of them lend themselves very well to condensing to a medium where quite literally every word is vital, and where image is just as if not more important than word.
...and I just realized that I could condense all that by saying that this is the part of DT where it's more like Shane than anything done by Sergio Leone, and Leone lends himself to comics in terms of style, while Shane just begs something overwrought and too detailed. And King loves him some details. So. :D
no subject
...and I just realized that I could condense all that by saying that this is the part of DT where it's more like Shane than anything done by Sergio Leone, and Leone lends himself to comics in terms of style, while Shane just begs something overwrought and too detailed. And King loves him some details. So. :D